Sunday, December 27, 2009

Who was more entertained by TNA Impact than WWE programming this week?

TNA airs one show a week, while WWE has Raw, ECW, Superstars, and Smackdown! and TNA Impact was still a better show than WWE combined. Does anyone else feel the same way?Who was more entertained by TNA Impact than WWE programming this week?
1. TNA was pretty good(all returns and 1 debut)


2. RAW was just embarassing


3. ECW was ok


4. ECW is getting better(Hart Trilogy)


5. SD! was good too,the rey attack and the ending


6. I am not interested in WWE SuperstarsWho was more entertained by TNA Impact than WWE programming this week?
TNA seems like a better show because it fresh, has different faces and seems like they know how to change the show up without having to move their superstars to other shows, like WWE does. WWE uses the same story lines over and over until they dry out. TNA adds new faces and tries different feuds. But remember TNA is owned and ran by guys that have been in the business for years. I'm not saying WWE doesn't know what they are doing, because i think they are doing a great job. It's just TNA is a fresh face, and remains to be fresh and new. WWE always seems to be the company ';setting the bar'; with Wrestlemania and The Hall of Fame. But TNA is the ';other show'; it might seem like they are always picking up the superstars WWE ';throws away'; but it's working for them. If you think about it, each of those superstars have fans. And those fans might not ';switch'; shows, but they will be tuning in. Until WWE keeps and gets more new superstars, i feel TNA will always feel like a fresh face. Also TNA is not afraid of change. For example: They just got the new Legends title, yet WWE only has the ECW championship on ECW. A great place where they couple put the Cruiserweight title and the hardcore tite. Also they should of left ECW the way it was. The old ECW, the Extreme Rules side. That would of shown that WWE isn't afraid of change but also respects the ';Extreme'; fans of old ECW. But like I said before, WWE is the WWE. Until they start hurting in ratings, they will stay the way they are because that's the way its been for years and years.
TNA was pretty good, I liked it better than Raw, but i found ECW entertaining. (Evan Bourne vs Mark Henry and Hart Trilogy and Jack Swagger vs Tommy Dreamer and Christian).


But this week my favorite was smackdown (as always) because its just plain out more entertaining. I loved The Great Khali and R-truth, the World's Greatest tag Team looked impresive against Cryme Tyme, Umaga vs John Morrison was awesome, and i was shocked when jericho was dressed as a Mysterio fan then attacked him.


So overall, I understand why you would say TNA was better this week, because of the debut and returns of 3 great stars, and i loved Styles vs Daniels, but Smackdown takes the cake this week
it wasnt better than all programing combined to me right now im at a tie at my favorite wrestling program between impact and smackdown. Impact was better than raw cuz i didnt even watch raw thats how bad i thought it would be and it was better than ecw but its a tie with smackdown right now for me but once edge loses the belt(hopefully not for a long time) that is when impact will be my outright favorite.
Right now, for me TNA Impact %26amp; WWE Smackdown are tied at first place. ECW comes in at a strong %26amp; solid second place.





WWE RAW :-( Oh how the mighty have fallen. It's pathetic!





WWE Superstars...I only watch it when it has wrestlers %26amp; matches that interest me.
definitely NOT.





TNA only has to do booking and work for ONE show a week. WWE has to do RAW, SMACKDOWN, ECW, AND NOW WWE SUPERSTARS.





do you think it`d be easier to do 4 shows or 1 show a week?
Ive been looking forward to watching Impact more than WWE shows since TNA Impact first aired in Australia
I do. I can't wait 'til TNA comes here in 15 days.
NOT ME. WWE IS THE STUFF.

No comments:

Post a Comment